TLDR; Map the TOTE (Test, Operate, Test, Exit) model on to TDD, Exploratory Testing, Design processes, Analysis, Learning, Decision Making and Problem Solving.
TOTE
In 1960, George Miller, presented a model of problem solving which he called the T.O.T.E model
- Test, Operate, Test, Exit
The notion being that you loop around a [Test, Operate]* cycle and when your Test is complete, then you have done enough Operations and you can Exit.
It was a model of problem solving, or decision making.
I wrote about it a while back on the blog and in my NLP papers
You can find George Miller’s book Plans and the Structure of Behavior on archive.org. He describes the TOTE model in that book.
TOTE in Action
Showing T.O.T.E in action. I drew this dynamically to make the point that it is a cyclical process and we Test to decide if we continue to Operate, to Exit the process, and to change what we will operate.
You can see the 9 second version on Instagram
Test to build a model.
And sometimes we exit because things are Good Enough, but we still need criteria to determine what Good Enough means. And sometimes we Operate to learn if something is Good Enough.
TOTE for learning
At the time that I explored the TOTE model previously I didn’t make the connection that arc from Operate -> Test
was also a feedback process.
In the TOTE model the Test learns from Operate, which we can easily map on to Exploratory Testing.
- we come up with an idea to explore (
Test
) - we explore (
Operate
) - we learn from that (
Operate -> Test
) - we derive new things to explore (
Test
) - etc.
And we Exit
when our time has finished or we have covered our ideas or whatever other ‘exit’ criteria we started our testing with.
TDD TOTE
I’ve also written a lot more code using TDD. And I know that my TDD process very often resembles a TOTE process.
- write some
@Test
code (Test
) - see if fail and write some code to make the test pass (
Operate
) - write more
@Test
code to flesh out the design (Test
) - and repeat
Until our design is complete, or our review of our @Test
and code can’t come up with anything new, and we have compared it with our statement of intent, etc.
TOTE Learning
We could view this as a completely well defined process of evaluation where at every ‘Test’ point we know exactly what we are deciding upon and use the pre-defined evaluation criteria.
We could also view the Operate process as a learning process which feeds into the Test process and explains the cycle. Each time we ‘do’ something (operate), we learn something which we feed into the Test process.
I missed the learning process inherent in the Operate -> Test
arc first time around.
I won’t do that again, and that makes TOTE an even better model for the type of work I do.
A model worth investigating.
See also
- instagram.com/p/BTnqhiQAGr0
- www.instagram.com/p/BTpdkSSAz0K
- the 2002 blog post
- NLP for Testers
- George Miller’s book Plans and the Structure of Behavior
PS. If you want your own T.O.T.E model diagram then feed this into Graphviz or WebGraphviz
digraph G {
node [shape = "rectangle"];
Test -> {Operate Exit}
Operate -> Test
subgraph { rank = same; Test; Exit}
Exit [shape = "ellipse"];
}
You will need a Github account to comment. Or you can contact me with your comment.
I reserve the right to delete spam comments e.g. if your comment adds no value and its purpose is simply to create a backlink to another site offering training, or courses, etc.